Is morality a prerequisite for happiness Leave your email to keep updated with our latest special offers! Sign up How we use your email?
Hire Writer Happiness is an adjective, something that describes how we feel. It is a feeling of pleasure and satisfaction that can last for any amount of time, from a minute to a year to your entire life. Happiness if it is possible is even more subjective than morality.
Suffice to say happiness is a reaction, so basically one becomes happy after they have done or received something. There is the odd occasion of a person who is happy for no reason. A simple example of this: Bob and Mary and brought up in two different homes, environments, with different family values.
Now as teenagers Mary finds it a drag to look for and have a job, where as Bob gets satisfaction out of working because it is apart of his upbringing.
When talking about if moral behaviour is necessary for happiness, one must think about how it affects society vs. In a study of the human nature done by it has been proven that humans like to take the easier root.
Immoral behaviour is exactly that the easier root, which in turn makes it immoral in one way or another. To put it plainly there are many people out there who have acted immorally and yet are happy to this very day with their lives.
In conclusion, it is not necessary to behave morally to achieve happiness. With morality and happiness being as subjective as they are, especially in the world we live in today with all this greed, immoral behaviour will seem much more appealing to the average person.The major types of college essays.
Is Moral Behavior Necessary for Happiness? Can happiness be considered a sign for doing the right things? The answer is probably yes. Both happiness and morality are abstract in nature, which complicates the understanding of the relationship between them.
Happiness does not happen by chance, but is sought. "Is Moral Behavior Necessary For Happiness" Essays and Research Papers Is Moral Behavior Necessary For Happiness Moral Behavior: Aquinas and Aristotle vs. Kant When comparing between the philosophies of St. Thomas Aquinas/Aristotle and those of Immanuel Kant when regarding moral behavior, there are some very fundamental differences.
Of course, the ancient and medieval thinkers were ready with a response to this question: acting virtuously is a necessary condition for happiness (a notion I will consider in greater depth in a moment). The authors suggest that moral behavior is not necessary for happiness and does not ensure it.
Yet they also argue that morality and happiness are needed for living well, and together suffice to achieve that goal. Introduction The purpose of this paper is to discuss moral behaviour and if it is necessary for happiness. The standpoint of this paper is that moral behaviour is necessary in the attainment of happiness.
Therefore, the paper will be committed to demonstrating the said position.
For this essay this paper will be discussing the subject of moral behaviour and if it is necessary for happiness. The view that this paper will reflect and focus on is that “moral” behaviour is not absolutely necessary to be happy.